Discovery sheds light on how vertebrates see...The fossil of a 300-million-year-old primitive jawless fish -- a lamprey -- about 6 cm in length. .

Discovery sheds light on how vertebrates see

August 2, 2016
University of Leicester discovery sheds light on how vertebrates see
The fossil of a 300-million-year-old primitive jawless fish -- a lamprey -- about 6 cm in length. The eyes are the two dark circles on the right-hand side and are so well-preserved the retina and lens can be seen in high magnification. Credit: Rober Sansom
New research led by the University of Leicester has overturned a long-standing theory on how vertebrates evolved their eyes by identifying remarkable details of the retina in the eyes of 300 million year-old lamprey and hagfish fossils.
The study, published in the journalProceedings of the Royal Society B, led by Professor Sarah Gabbott from the University of Leicester Department of Geology, shows that fossil hagfish eyes were well-developed, indicating that the ancient animal could see, whereas their living counterparts are completely blind after millions of years of degeneration - a kind of reverse evolution.
The researchers examined the eye tissue in two fossil jawless fish species - Mayomyzon(a lamprey) and Myxinikela (a hagfish) found in the Carboniferous age Mazon Creek fossil bed, Illinois.
Using a high-powered scanning electron microscope to magnify the eye 5,000 times they could see that the fossil retina is composed of minute structures called melanosomes - the same structures that occur in  and prevent stray light bouncing around in the eye allowing us to form a clear visual image.
This is the first time that such details in fossil vertebrate eyes have been brought to bear on the tricky problem of how their eyes evolved.
University of Leicester discovery sheds light on how vertebrates see
Professor Sarah Gabbott on fieldwork in Illinois digging for new fossil specimens. In her hand is a hard nodule formed 300 million years ago on a warm, shallow sea floor. Credit: Thomas Clements
The eye is a complex structure and must have evolved through small step-by-step changes but these are not recorded in living animals and until now it was thought that these anatomical details could not be preserved in fossils.
Professor Gabbott explains: "To date models of vertebrate eye evolution focus only on living animals and the blind and 'rudimentary' hagfish eye was held-up as critical evidence of an intermediate stage in eye evolution. Living hagfish eyes appeared to sit between the simple light sensitive eye 'spots' of non- and the sophisticated camera-style eyes of lampreys and most other vertebrates."
The details of the retina in the fossil hagfish indicates that it had a functional visual system, meaning that living hagfish eyes have been lost through millions of years of evolution, and these animals are not as primitively simple as we originally believed. As a result they are not the most appropriate model for understanding eye evolution.
Professor Gabbott added: "Sight is perhaps our most cherished sense but its evolution in vertebrates is enigmatic and a cause célèbre for creationists. We bring new fossil evidence to bear on an iconic evolutionary problem: the early evolution of the vertebrate eye. We will now scrutinize the eyes of other ancient vertebrate fossils to see if we can finally build a picture of the sequence of events that took place in early vertebrate eye evolution."
The team also found the earliest evidence of skin pigment patterning in a .
She added: "This heralds the realistic possibility of inferring details of the ecology and behavior of our ancient ancestors. Animals today have stripes for many reasons from camouflage to sexual display- we now have the potential to understand behavior in long extinct vertebrates."
 Explore further: Keeping an eye on evolution
More information: Pigmented anatomy in Carboniferous cyclostomes, and the evolution of the vertebrate eye, Proceedings of the Royal Society B,rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/lookup/doi/10.1098/rspb.2016.1151 


Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2016-08-discovery-vertebrates.html#jCp

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

“La crítica de arte ha perdido totalmente su función” Benjamin H. D. Buchloh -Germany (1941)

Image
La Critríca de arte ha perdido totalmente su función El historiador del arte reflexiona sobre la  p intura en la era digital y la dictadura del  mercado Otros 11 Guardar Enviar por correo Imprimir IKER SEISDEDOS 20 MAR 2016 - 00:23 CET BERNARDO PÉREZ El profesor de Harvard Benjamin H. D. Buchloh (Colonia, 1941)   es uno de los más influyentes historiadores del arte del siglo XX. León de Oro en la Bienal de Venecia de 2007, fue exégeta de los primeros conceptualismos europeos antes de mudarse en los setenta desde Alemania Occidental a Estados Unidos, donde ha intervenido en la esfera pública del arte junto a   Rosalind Krauss, Yve-Alain Bois   y   Hal Foster,   coautores del esencial tratado   Arte desde 1900  (Akal)   y compañeros de la revista   October,   boletín de pensamiento crítico que, libre de publicidad, edita el   Massachussets Institute of Technology (MIT). En el grupo de los últimos mohicanos de la crítica, Buchloh se sitúa en la e
Read more

Chaos & An Unpredictable Tomorrow --Peter Saltzstein finds that Chaos Theory yields unexpected philosophical results.

Image
Philosophical Science   Print   Email   Discuss Share             Related Articles What is Philosophy of Science  Good For? Biotechnologies: Tweaking Here, Tuning There. Is that all we need? Science & Philosophy: A Beautiful Friendship Paul Feyerabend And The Monster ‘Science’ Shock the Monkey Philosophical Astronomy Thinking Straight About Curved Space Hypotheses? Forget About It! After the Science Wars What is a Thought Experiment, Anyhow? Chaos & An Unpredictable Tomorrow Peter Saltzstein  finds that Chaos Theory yields unexpected philosophical results. The future is not what it used to be. I mean, an intriguing implication of the branch of mathematics called  chaos theory  is that the future states of complex dynamical systems such as the weather, the human brain, the stock market, evolution, and history itself, are not what we once thought them to be. Specifically, chaos theory suggests that the behavior of complex systems can f
Read more

Negatives about CIRCUMCISION -The male prepuce, or foreskin, is a highly mobile and extraordinarily sensitive double fold of tissue that is the end of the penis.

Image
  Why do Americans go out of their way to remove this part of human anatomy, when the rest of the world does not? The male prepuce, or foreskin, is a highly mobile and extraordinarily sensitive double fold of tissue that  is  the end of the penis.   The male prepuce, or foreskin, is a highly mobile and extraordinarily sensitive double fold of tissue that  is  the end of the penis.  Why do Americans go out of their way to remove this part of human anatomy, when the rest of the world does not? Note: Never have I gotten so many comments and emails in response to a blog post, much less rumors that I’m a man. I’ll keep that in mind. And for the record, it wasn’t until 2014 that I had the opportunity to put a man’s intact penis in my very much female vagina. This frictionless appendage made me realize that sex doesn’t have to be painful or cause hazardous inflammation. And with that image in your mind… I was nineteen or twenty years old when a male friend of mine, we’ll call him B
Read more